Matt Dye now has “Sharon Tate” prints available. It is a 24″ x 36″ 3-color Screenprint on Rainbow Foil with Metallic Inks and clear coat. Limited edition of 50, and cost $75. On sale now HERE.
“Sharon Tate” by Matt Dye. 24″ x 36″ 3-color Screenprint. Ed of 50. $75 (Rainbow Foil)
8 thoughts on ““Sharon Tate” by Matt Dye”
This is SICK!! Why would you sell this crap?
Sharon and her family do not deserve this disrespect!
I think you have jumped to conclusions. There are other versions of this poster that don’t use the red, perhaps that is what is getting people upset. Not the intent of Matt to put her in hell. Why would anybody do that?
How do we know that it’s her burning hell? The flame design could just be that…a design.
If there is some sort of hell-like meaning to it, than I think it’s down right disrespectful and hurtful. If it’s just a design, than fair enough however, people are obviously offended by it’s possible symbolism.
It’s tasteless anyway to take Sharon’s image (or anyone who had been a victim of something so brutal) and use it for ‘art’.
This is a beautiful piece. I know the artist and his intent was absolutely not to represent Sharon Tate in hell. I am a huge fan of Sharon Tate and this piece of art. Now the Frank Kozik Sharon Tate poster, that seems pretty demonic to me.
This is SICK!! Why would you sell this crap?
Sharon and her family do not deserve this disrespect!
They don’t deserve that and that is not the intent. Calm down.
I find this poster depicting Sharon Tate burning in hell to be offensive,vile & disgusting !!!!
This is ugly as fuck! Who would buy this fucking crap?? Sharon was an angel and is most certainly NOT in hell. Wtf were you thinking?
I think you have jumped to conclusions. There are other versions of this poster that don’t use the red, perhaps that is what is getting people upset. Not the intent of Matt to put her in hell. Why would anybody do that?
How do we know that it’s her burning hell? The flame design could just be that…a design.
If there is some sort of hell-like meaning to it, than I think it’s down right disrespectful and hurtful. If it’s just a design, than fair enough however, people are obviously offended by it’s possible symbolism.
It’s tasteless anyway to take Sharon’s image (or anyone who had been a victim of something so brutal) and use it for ‘art’.
It’s just a design. The Gold version probably wouldn’t get people as excited
This is a beautiful piece. I know the artist and his intent was absolutely not to represent Sharon Tate in hell. I am a huge fan of Sharon Tate and this piece of art. Now the Frank Kozik Sharon Tate poster, that seems pretty demonic to me.